Screenshots from developers: 2002 vs. 2015 (2015)(anders.unix.se)
77 points byturrini2 hours ago |8 comments
gentooflux44 minutes ago
RMS could have taken a photo of his screen, or done something cheeky like dump his screen to a padded ASCII text file and submitted that. Stick in the mud.
nighthawk45428 minutes ago
On the contrary, I think that was a wonderful answer and reflects the POV well. Hard to imagine something more Stallman-esque!
ekjhgkejhgk21 minutes ago
"I don't know how to make a screenshot" - what a fucking star.
jsk260018 minutes ago
This is the guy who is 'browsing' web using wget+email afterall:

> For personal reasons, I do not browse the web from my computer. (I also have not net connection much of the time.) To look at page I send mail to a demon which runs wget and mails the page back to me. It is very efficient use of my time, but it is slow in real time.

rightbyte14 minutes ago
Ye I need more pure hearted dogmatism in my life such that I can say that and don't lie. Have some secretary send me webpages with obfuscated JS by fax when I need to sin.
DANmode35 minutes ago
He’s…something.
bigyabai32 minutes ago
The Trisquel website has some screenshots. The 7.0 LTS is from 2014 so it's likely he was probably running something like this: https://trisquel.info/en/7.0-screenshots
Almondsetat4 minutes ago
RMS to me is really a curious case. He doesn't know how to install GNU+Linux and relies on others to do it. He doesn't know how to take a screenshot, and I remember reading other snippets from him about not knowing how to perform other basic tasks.
apetresc29 minutes ago
I completely misread '2015' as '2025' and thought these were from this November rather than November 10 years ago. I couldn't believe so many people were still using what appeared to be Aqua-era OS X.
lieuwex10 minutes ago
pelagicAustral14 minutes ago
Old macOS has got so much soul. I missed all those years since I started working with it back when Sierra was around, clearly not the same.
Retr0id31 minutes ago
Linus Torvalds currently uses Fedora with GNOME, which was fun to learn because that's also been my personal choice for a while now.

(source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfv0V1SxbNA )

WD-4211 minutes ago
He said also because fedora seemed the most amenable to running custom kernels which is basically what he does all day.
quantumfissure23 minutes ago
It's been well known for awhile now that it's his preferred setup.

He seems to want as much stability as possible; while being as minimal as possible; with as little fuss to install and keep up to date as possible. Fedora meets those needs. Gnome is Fedora's main concentration.

Retr0id6 minutes ago
Oh I didn't know Gnome was the official flavour now, last time I paid attention it was still KDE
jsk260017 minutes ago
He explained that in the linked video - Fedora makes it easy for him to test custom kernel builds.
preisschild23 minutes ago
Yeah mine too (but using Silverblue).

After spending years with Arch/NixOS/Ubuntu/Sway Im quite happy with Fedora+GNOME now. It just works.

jasoneckert38 minutes ago
I echo this as well, and in retrospect, it explains why I use the Sway tiling window manager today.
Zambyte23 minutes ago
What are you echoing?
jsk260022 minutes ago
Mostly tiling WMs and terminals
vzaliva47 minutes ago
common theme: tiled layout, terminals, minimum fancy decorations.
omnicognate5 minutes ago
And that hasn't changed much since. At work and at home, I'm usually looking at emacs with no tab or menu bar, full screen on all monitors, with everything else (browser, etc) a virtual desktop switch away: exwm at home, one terminal emacsclient in ssh per monitor with a single daemon on linux server (accessed from Windows) at work. With many minor variations this is how my desktop has looked since my first programming job, which coincidentally was in 2002, but the setup has changed a lot. The bit that has remained constant is that all I want on my monitor(s) when I'm programming is code.
ajross14 minutes ago
I think I see only one truly tiled layout. But yes, "terminals and editors" as the core developer workflow is extremely conserved over time. It dates from the mid 80's on Sun 2's and really hasn't changed much in four decades.

It's probably not worth arguing whether this is the "best" when compared with vscode+LSP+Claude or whatever happens to be en vogue in the moment.

But terminals and editors is sticky in a way that tells me it's probably close to optimal. Those of us in the cult aren't observed to leave the compound except in extremely rare circumstances. I'll be doing the same stuff on my death bed, likely.