comrade12343 hours ago
My coworkers gifted me a painting by cheeta (the last chimp to play him) when I left the job. I framed it professionally in rattan and banana wood. The painting itself looks very similar to the paintings by Ai- same color schemes and patterns.

Edit to add instead of a new comment: I also remember how good of a life he had in retirement. He lived in an apartment-like dwelling. Slept in a bed, woke up and ate some fruit. Would plink on the piano awhile, maybe paint some, go for a swim or walk, maybe play the piano or paint some more.... it was amusing to read while slaving away at the coding mines.

shevy-java4 hours ago
I misread this as AI initially ...

The only art-centric monkey I knew was Koko, the female gorilla.

Here she draws some things:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iixL0CMOAM

Smartest monkey I ever saw was Kanzi though:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENKinbfgrkU

I think it is only a question and matter of time before the prison systems for monkeys may have to be reconsidered completely. Of course even smarter monkeys than Kanzi won't reach human brain functions, but they are also very convincingly extremely clever and can adapt. Numerous videos where monkeys handle (!) smartphones show this already and this is just the beginning. Like, in the movie Planet of the Apes. Just long-term in smaller steps.

conception3 hours ago
Fun fact! Koko’s abilities to sign and communicate were a total fraud!

https://bigthink.com/life/ape-sign-language/

junon1 hour ago
To dismiss it as total fraud is disingenuous, but I do agree that the personification of some of those videos is quite egregious. I don't think anyone expected a chimp to make coherent, grammatically correct sentences. But the relationship between sign/vocalization and emotion/desire is strong and seen in many animals, such as parrots. It depends on your definition of communication I suppose.
conception14 minutes ago
There’s no evidence that KoKo ever communicated a word and had understanding of what the word meant outside of basic Pavlovian associations.
moi238821 minutes ago
Is it?

Afaik they didn’t actually sign anything other than random words, an “food” every second word or so..

ChrisMarshallNY4 hours ago
Don't call him a monk- aaaaarghhh...

https://discworld.fandom.com/wiki/The_Librarian

bicolao1 hour ago
> I misread this as AI initially ...

The japanese have it harder because "ai" means love. But perhaps "love" will be written in kanji while "AI" in katakana, so writing form is not confusing.

dejj4 hours ago
"I think this was a powerful lesson on the dangers of AI. Which by the way means 'love' in Chinese."

Elon Tusk, Rick and Morty, S4E4: https://youtu.be/xQHCz9ZZorA?t=129

navigate83103 hours ago
Here's Rambo, an orangutan, driving a golf cart in Dubai: https://youtu.be/ERTrOwEb5M8
brap3 hours ago
Koko, that chimp’s alright.
bbor3 hours ago
And before someone comes in to correct: yes, we're monkeys. No, the taxonomists don't know any better! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey
mrintegrity5 hours ago
Would love to see some of his paintings, let me just google "AI chimp painting" .. oh..
fyltr5 hours ago
mrintegrity5 hours ago
Thanks, they seem like more than just random splashes of color.. possibly I'm anthropomorphising but it feels like it was straining to draw something specific like a young child would.
shevy-java4 hours ago
Yes, same with Koko. I think they do not fully understand art and abstraction, nor profits made by good art. It is too abstract.

They can, however had, understand sign language and symbol language, and basically that art is also an abstraction. Will probably take a while before we can identify abstract art by apes.

falloutx4 hours ago
Hey, she did her best.
baxtr4 hours ago
It’s hardly distinguishable from modern art though!
grugdev4230 minutes ago
For anyone who is interested in this sort of thing, I can recommend this book:

Next of Kin: My Conversations with Chimpanzees by Roger Fouts

Absolutely brilliant!

aix15 hours ago
pavel_lishin20 minutes ago
Finally, some Ai art I can get behind.
toomuchtodo1 hour ago
walthamstow5 hours ago
> Born wild, Ai was soon taken into captivity and sold to KUPRI in 1977 by an animal trader (this type of sale became illegal in 1980 with Japan's ratification of CITES).

So how do we do this kind of thing now?

shevy-java4 hours ago
I think monkeys are still bred in some zoos. I know that because there is typically media outrage when monkeys are killed in zoos when they were overbred. It's a very questionable system, since they are basically prisoners, then kind of forced or encouraged to breed, and then whacked to death when there are "too many". It's weird because zoos also claim to help preserve some species.
lukan1 hour ago
Zoos do help to preserve species. Whether that is worth it, when their natural habitat is destroyed is a different question.

And if we agree there should be Zoos (I don't) then breeding the animals there is definitely nicer, than capturing a wild animal and force it to adopt to the prison livestyle.

brador3 hours ago
Why should we?
beaker523 hours ago
Sleep easy fellow earthling, there’s a new Ai in town now.
RankingMember1 hour ago
I'd genuinely like a black bar for this- cross-species respect.
echelon_musk4 hours ago
Reminds me of AiAi in Super Monkey Ball.
eej712 hours ago
Glad to see I wasn't the only one! That Super Monkey Ball game on the GameCube was just amazing.
fedeb955 hours ago
does someone have a video about him counting and/or painting?
Sirikon5 hours ago
Hey universe, when people is asking for the end of AI, they don't mean this.
hxugufjfjf5 hours ago
Impossible to not make a joke about this being just more ai news on the front page.
slfnflctd3 hours ago
Apparently, since the majority of top level comments right now - about 6 at the time of my comment - are making basically the same joke.

I thought this place was supposed to be better than reddit in such ways. Do better, HN.

falloutx4 hours ago
God took the wrong Ai, RIP
xvxvx1 hour ago
49 years enslaved in a laboratory, forced to learn tricks, likely deprived of food and comfort until she played along. No clue why Jane Goodall embraced such cruelty. Showing how intelligent non-human animals are, then forcing them to endure such inhumane treatment is par the course for 'scientists'.